← Selected programs
Project delivery · Product launches

Repeatable Seven-Site Launch Program

Built and refined a repeatable cross-functional launch model that took seven new digital brands from approved concept to go-live in eight weeks, with staggered launches every six to eight weeks.

7 launches~8 weeks concept-to-live6–8 week launch cadenceOn time & within budget
7brands launched
~8 weeksconcept to go-live
6–8 weekslaunch cadence
On timeand within budget

Business Objective

The brands initially began as commerce properties designed to capture Amazon-driven revenue opportunities. As the model developed, I identified a larger opportunity: build them into commercially viable standalone brands with their own audiences, monetization strategies, first-party user data, and sales potential.

The program was designed to diversify the company portfolio, enter new audience and sales markets, expand geographic and category opportunities, and create additional revenue channels beyond the original commerce model.

My Role

Outside of executive leadership, I had final operating responsibility for the launches. I owned the overall launch budgets, project coordination, launch readiness, editorial execution, stakeholder alignment, and delivery oversight.

I approved design assets, directed editorial teams, approved the scope of commerce work for each brand, coordinated with SEO, and partnered with sales and ad operations to support post-launch monetization. I also made sure new brands were positioned for discovery across external distribution partners such as Apple News, Google, Yahoo, and Flipboard.

Concept approval · market opportunity and leadership alignment
Design + engineering · brand assets, framework build, QA
SEO + commerce + ad ops · discoverability and monetization readiness
Editorial production · launch inventory plus two months of planned publishing
Sign-off + launch · dependencies resolved, stakeholders aligned, go-live approved

Launch Workflow

  • Leadership approved the concept and market opportunity.
  • Design created the brand identity and visual assets for approval.
  • Engineering built the site using an established framework and completed QA.
  • SEO helped shape the content framework and discoverability strategy.
  • Commerce created launch content tied to immediate monetization opportunities.
  • Ad operations configured the site to compete effectively across preferred programmatic advertising platforms.
  • Editorial produced a substantial launch catalog and built the first two months of daily publishing into the editorial calendar.
  • External distribution and discovery channels were prepared before launch.
  • Dependencies and required stakeholder sign-offs were tracked through an ongoing launch checklist.
  • Once required teams were aligned and I was satisfied with launch readiness, the go-live date was established.

Project Tracking & Governance

Asana served as the primary project-management system, with work tracked across milestones, owners, dependencies, and launch tasks. Performance reporting came from platforms such as Google Analytics, while other business functions maintained their own operating systems.

I sent leadership biweekly project updates to surface progress and emerging issues and held monthly leadership reviews covering performance, budget, opportunities, blockers, and cross-functional concerns.

Risk & Dependency Management

  • Insufficient editorial content volume at go-live, which could undermine audience momentum.
  • Incorrect or incomplete ad-operations setup, which could reduce programmatic revenue from the start.
  • Engineering omissions that could negatively affect site performance or launch readiness.

Engineering and design were the largest early dependencies. Content inventory was the largest volume requirement, while relationships with external distribution platforms were initially difficult to establish but became significantly easier once those partnerships and processes were in place.

Budget & Resource Optimization

Launch budgets were established in advance with granular allocations for teams and tasks, and I controlled the overall budget.

As the launch framework matured, I identified areas where spending could be reduced without increasing risk. Because later sites were built on a proven engineering framework and design assets were arriving correctly, QA became more predictable and less resource-intensive.

I worked with engineering to reduce unnecessary launch spend and reallocated those resources to areas where they could produce greater value.

Key Delivery Challenge

The second launch was the most difficult. I took ownership immediately before the first site went live and inherited a process with significant inefficiencies. The second launch followed quickly, leaving limited time to absorb lessons from the first.

I was effectively redesigning the launch process while continuing to deliver against the next deadline. That experience helped me identify which parts of the launch required the most attention, which steps could be standardized, and where teams were spending effort without a proportional impact on results.

Change & Scope Management

One brand entered the program without a clear editorial identity despite having a valid commerce opportunity. Multiple stakeholder groups had different views about its direction, while leadership did not have a strong preference.

Rather than allow the ambiguity to continue, I selected a direction, reframed the brand’s content strategy and output, aligned the team around the revised scope, and communicated the decision and expected growth trajectory to leadership.

Results

7 websites and brands successfully launched
~8 weeks from approved concept to go-live
6–8 weeks between staggered launches
On time across the program
Within budget across established launch thresholds
Lower cost engineering and QA as the framework matured

Lasting Impact

The program evolved from seven individual launches into a reusable launch methodology.

By learning where launch risk was concentrated, which dependencies required the most attention, how much content and capacity were actually needed, and which activities could be standardized, I created a more predictable and efficient delivery model.